GEMA v. Suno: The Machine That Learned to Sing Someone Else’s Songs
For years, the AI industry has relied on a wonderfully convenient metaphor.
Artificial intelligence doesn't copy.
It learns.
It studies enormous quantities of human creativity, extracts patterns, builds mathematical representations and then creates something new.
Very sophisticated.
Very technical.
Very reassuring.
Then somebody asks the machine to make music — and an old song starts crawling back out.
That is where the metaphor becomes considerably less comfortable.
On July 31, 2026, the Regional Court of Munich ruled against AI music company Suno in a copyright case brought by German collecting society GEMA.
The dispute concerned six well-known musical works.
Among them:
Forever Young.
Big in Japan.
Daddy Cool.
Rasputin.
Mambo No. 5.
Atemlos.
The court concluded that Suno did not have the right to process the protected works represented by GEMA in the way at issue in the case.
Suno disagrees with the ruling and has said it is evaluating its options, including an appeal.
So the legal battle is not finished.
But the first decision has landed.
And behind it sits a wonderfully nasty copyright question:
If an AI model learns a song well enough to reproduce it, where exactly did the copying happen?
Six Songs Walk Into a Neural Network
One important fact in the case was not disputed.
Suno's model had been trained on the six musical works at issue.
That immediately moved the case beyond one of the recurring mysteries of AI litigation: whether a particular copyrighted work was actually present in training material.
Here, the argument moved to what that training legally meant — and what remained inside the resulting model.
GEMA alleged infringement both through outputs generated by Suno and through reproductions embodied in the model underlying the music generator.
That second part is where things get interesting.
Because a neural network does not contain a convenient folder called:
/STOLEN_SONGS/FOREVER_YOUNG.MP3
Instead, training changes enormous collections of numerical parameters.
The industry's preferred description is that the model learns relationships and patterns.
Fine.
But copyright law has an annoying habit of asking practical questions.
Can protected expression be reconstructed?
Can it be reproduced?
Can the system generate something sufficiently similar to the original work?
And if it can, what exactly has been stored inside that mathematical machine?
When Memory Pretends to Be Mathematics
This is one of the deepest problems in generative-AI copyright law.
Human beings learn from copyrighted works constantly.
A musician can listen to thousands of songs and become a better musician.
A novelist can read Hemingway without obtaining a Hemingway training license.
A painter can spend an afternoon staring at Picasso.
Nobody normally describes the resulting human memory as an unauthorized database.
AI companies understandably love this analogy.
The machine learns too.
Except machines are not people.
They are manufactured commercial systems.
Their training can involve copying enormous quantities of data at industrial scale.
And, crucially, they can sometimes reproduce material that looks or sounds suspiciously like what went in.
At that point the charming analogy to a music student begins to wobble.
A student who listens to Forever Young does not become an online service capable of generating millions of songs for paying customers.
Suno does.
The Output Is the Awkward Part
Generative-AI companies have a stronger rhetorical position when their systems produce genuinely novel material.
Feed a machine ten million songs.
Ask it for something new.
Receive something nobody has heard before.
Now lawyers can argue endlessly about whether the intermediate training copies were lawful, whether text-and-data-mining exceptions apply, whether training is transformative and whether the resulting model contains protectable expression at all.
But recognizable outputs create a much simpler problem.
If an ordinary prompt can cause a system to produce material substantially resembling a protected composition, the discussion changes.
Suddenly the question is no longer purely:
What was the model trained on?
It becomes:
Why can it do that?
And that is a much nastier question to answer in court.
Where Is the Song?
Imagine putting a song into a conventional computer.
You save an MP3.
Easy.
There is a file.
There are bytes.
There is a copy.
Delete the file and the copy disappears.
Neural networks make this wonderfully messy.
A trained model may not retain the original work as a conventional file at all.
Instead, information learned during training is distributed across model parameters.
So where is the copyrighted work?
Everywhere?
Nowhere?
Partially encoded?
Statistically represented?
Memorized?
Reconstructable?
Copyright law was built around copies.
AI models force courts to decide what a “copy” means when information has been absorbed into billions of numbers and can later emerge through generation.
That isn't merely a technical puzzle.
It may determine who gets paid.
GEMA Wants the Answer to Be Simple
From the creators' side, the argument can be brutally straightforward.
You wanted a machine capable of making music.
Human musicians created an enormous library of valuable music.
You used that music to teach your commercial machine.
You didn't obtain permission.
You didn't pay.
And now the machine sells music-generation services.
Everything between those facts may involve spectacular mathematics.
But mathematics does not automatically erase copyright.
That is the pressure GEMA is applying.
The Munich ruling requires Suno to provide information concerning revenue connected to the unlawful use and leaves damages to be determined.
GEMA has described the judgment as globally significant.
For collecting societies, publishers and musicians watching AI companies consume the history of recorded music as training material, it certainly looks significant.
Suno Says the Court Got the Technology Wrong
Suno is not quietly accepting defeat.
The company says it disagrees with the ruling and argues that the decision fundamentally mischaracterizes how its technology works, how people use it and how U.S. law applies.
It is considering an appeal.
That matters.
This is not the final word from the German courts, much less a universal answer to AI training law.
Different jurisdictions may reach different conclusions.
Different datasets, models and outputs may produce different results.
And the boundary between learning statistical characteristics and reproducing protected expression remains one of the central unresolved questions of generative AI.
But Suno now has something AI companies increasingly dislike:
a judgment against it.
Not a manifesto.
Not an angry musician.
Not a Reddit argument.
A court judgment.
Music May Be AI Copyright’s Worst Battlefield
Music is particularly dangerous territory for generative AI.
A language model can absorb millions of books while producing prose that bears no obvious relationship to any particular novel.
An image generator can learn from millions of photographs and produce a fictional landscape.
Music has less room to hide.
Melody is recognizable.
Harmony is recognizable.
Rhythm is recognizable.
Structure is recognizable.
Humans are astonishingly good at hearing when one song sounds like another.
Copyright lawsuits existed over musical similarity long before anybody thought of neural networks.
Now add machines capable of ingesting gigantic musical catalogs and producing complete songs in seconds.
The old copyright problem has acquired a turbine.
The Licensing Bill Is Coming
Behind all the philosophy sits something much simpler.
Money.
If courts increasingly conclude that commercial AI developers cannot freely use protected music for training, the industry will need licenses.
And music licensing is not cheap.
Record companies know it.
Publishers know it.
Collecting societies know it.
AI companies know it.
The internet's enormous reservoir of music suddenly stops looking like free training material and starts looking like somebody else's inventory.
That could fundamentally change the economics of AI music.
The best models require enormous amounts of high-quality material.
If high-quality material requires permission, then datasets become assets.
Rights organizations become gatekeepers.
And training budgets acquire another very large column.
Royalties.
The Machine Learned the Song. Now Explain How.
The GEMA ruling does not end the global debate over AI training.
Suno can appeal.
Other courts can disagree.
Other legal systems can draw different lines.
Technology will change.
Models will change.
Training techniques will change.
But the Munich case has dragged an abstract argument into wonderfully concrete territory.
A copyrighted song went into the training process.
A machine learned from it.
The machine became capable of producing music.
And the rights holders walked into court and asked:
What happened to our song inside your machine?
For years, the AI industry has answered questions like that with mathematics.
The next generation of answers may need something else.
A license.
Copyright Registration will cost - $7
Public offer - read carefully before registration!
SciReg Terms of Service
1. General Provisions
These Terms of Service ("Terms") constitute a legally binding agreement between you ("Customer," "User," or "you") and SolCity Nav, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("SciReg," "Company," "we," "our," or "us"), governing your access to and use of the SciReg website and all related services.
By creating an Account, submitting Registration(s), uploading Submitted Materials, purchasing Registration(s), or otherwise using the Service, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to be bound by these Terms.
If you do not agree to these Terms, you must not access or use the Service.
The Company reserves the right to modify these Terms at any time. Revised Terms become effective immediately upon publication on the SciReg website. Your continued use of the Service after publication of revised Terms constitutes your acceptance of those revisions.
2. Definitions
For purposes of these Terms:
Account means a registered user account created through the SciReg website.
Customer means any individual or legal entity using the Service.
Service means the SciReg website and all services provided by SolCity Nav, LLC.
Registration means the submission of information and Submitted Materials through the Service for creation of a Registration Record.
Registration Record means the electronic record created and maintained by SciReg containing information supplied by the Customer together with the assigned registration number and registration date.
Registration Certificate means the electronic certificate generated by SciReg confirming creation of a Registration Record.
Submitted Materials means any files, documents, manuscripts, publications, software, databases, images, audiovisual works, research materials, or other content submitted by the Customer through the Service.
3. Description of the Service
SciReg is an independent online registration and publication service that enables Customers to create dated electronic Registration Records for intellectual works and other Submitted Materials.
For each accepted Registration, SciReg may:
- assign a unique registration number;
- record the date and time of Registration;
- maintain a Registration Record;
- securely store Submitted Materials;
- apply a digital signature to the Submitted Materials to enable verification of their integrity and detection of any subsequent modifications;
- generate and issue a Registration Certificate;
- apply a digital signature to the Registration Certificate to enable verification of its authenticity and integrity;
- publish Registration information where publication is selected or otherwise authorized by the Customer.
SciReg operates as a private commercial service and is not affiliated with any governmental authority.
4. Nature of the Service
SciReg is an independent private registration service.
SciReg is not:
- a government copyright office;
- a patent office;
- a trademark office;
- a governmental registration authority;
- a court of law;
- a notary public;
- an arbitration tribunal.
SciReg does not:
- determine authorship;
- determine ownership of intellectual property rights;
- verify the identity of Customers;
- verify the accuracy of submitted information;
- verify originality of Submitted Materials;
- determine whether Submitted Materials qualify for copyright or other legal protection under any jurisdiction;
- provide legal advice or legal opinions;
- resolve disputes concerning ownership or intellectual property rights.
SciReg creates Registration Records solely on the basis of information provided by the Customer. The Company does not independently verify the identity of the Customer or the accuracy, completeness, legality, ownership, originality, authenticity, or legal status of any Submitted Materials.
A Registration Certificate confirms only that SciReg received specified information and Submitted Materials, created a Registration Record, assigned a registration number, and recorded the corresponding date and time of Registration.
A Registration Certificate is not a governmental registration, is not evidence of ownership or authorship, does not establish the existence or validity of copyright or any other intellectual property rights, and does not constitute a legal opinion, certification, adjudication, or governmental act.
5. Registration Procedure
To create a Registration Record, the Customer must:
- Create a SciReg Account or sign in to an existing Account.
- Complete the Registration form by providing the required information.
- Upload the Submitted Materials. Each Registration may include one archive file not exceeding 7 MB in size.
- Pay the applicable Registration fee, unless the Registration qualifies for a free Registration offered by the Company.
- Submit the Registration through the Service.
Upon successful completion of the Registration process and receipt of payment, if applicable, SciReg will create a Registration Record, assign a unique registration number, record the date and time of Registration, and make a Registration Certificate available to the Customer.
As part of a completed Registration, SciReg applies a digital signature to the Submitted Materials and the Registration Certificate. The digital signature is intended to verify the integrity of the signed files, confirm that the Registration Certificate originated from SciReg, and detect any subsequent modifications to the signed files.
The Company reserves the right to reject or cancel any Registration that violates these Terms or applicable law.
6. Registration Fees
The Company may offer free Registrations and paid Registrations.
Unless otherwise stated on the SciReg website:
- the first two (2) Registrations submitted by a Customer are provided free of charge;
- each additional Registration is subject to a fee of US $7.00.
Registration fees are subject to change at any time. Any revised fees apply only to Registrations submitted after publication of the updated pricing.
All payments are non-refundable except where required by applicable law or expressly approved by the Company in its sole discretion.
Taxes, duties, bank charges, currency conversion fees, and similar charges imposed by third parties remain the sole responsibility of the Customer.
7. Customer Responsibilities
The Customer represents and warrants that:
- the Customer has the legal right to submit the Submitted Materials;
- the Submitted Materials do not knowingly violate any applicable law;
- the Submitted Materials do not knowingly infringe the intellectual property or other legal rights of any third party;
- all information provided during Registration is accurate and complete to the best of the Customer's knowledge.
The Customer is solely responsible for the content, legality, accuracy, ownership, and use of all Submitted Materials.
If Submitted Materials contain confidential, proprietary, trade secret, personal, or otherwise sensitive information, the Customer is solely responsible for determining whether submission to the Service is appropriate.
The Customer remains solely responsible for determining whether any AI-generated or AI-assisted materials qualify for copyright or other legal protection under applicable law.
8. License Granted to SciReg
The Customer retains all ownership and intellectual property rights in the Submitted Materials.
By submitting materials through the Service, the Customer grants SciReg a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to:
- receive and process the Submitted Materials;
- create and maintain Registration Records;
- store backup copies;
- generate Registration Certificates;
- reproduce Submitted Materials as reasonably necessary for operation of the Service;
- publish Registration information where publication is selected or authorized by the Customer.
This license exists solely for the purpose of operating the Service and terminates when continued retention is no longer required for operation of the Service, legal compliance, dispute resolution, or legitimate business purposes.
Nothing in these Terms transfers ownership of the Submitted Materials to the Company.
9. Prohibited Use
The Customer agrees not to use the Service:
- for unlawful purposes;
- to submit malicious software or harmful code;
- to upload material that intentionally infringes the rights of third parties;
- to interfere with operation or security of the Service;
- to attempt unauthorized access to Company systems or other user Accounts;
- to submit false or misleading Registration information.
The Company reserves the right to refuse, suspend, remove, or terminate any Registration or Account that violates these Terms or applicable law without prior notice.
10. Privacy
The Company collects, stores, and processes personal information solely for the purpose of operating the Service, maintaining Registration Records, communicating with Customers, processing payments, complying with legal obligations, preventing fraud, and improving the Service.
The Company does not sell Customers' personal information to third parties.
By using the Service, the Customer consents to such processing of personal information.
11. Electronic Communications
The Customer agrees that all notices, disclosures, Registration Certificates, invoices, receipts, and other communications provided electronically by the Company satisfy any legal requirement that such communications be in writing.
12. Intellectual Property
The SciReg website, software, design, logos, trademarks, text, graphics, databases, and all other materials provided by the Company are the exclusive property of SolCity Nav, LLC or its licensors and are protected by applicable intellectual property laws.
Except as expressly permitted by these Terms, no part of the Service may be copied, reproduced, modified, distributed, reverse engineered, or otherwise used without the Company's prior written permission.
13. Availability of the Service
The Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to keep the Service available.
However, SciReg does not guarantee uninterrupted operation or continuous availability.
The Service may be modified, suspended, restricted, or discontinued at any time without prior notice.
The Company may perform maintenance, upgrades, security improvements, or other technical operations that temporarily interrupt the availability of the Service.
14. Disclaimer of Warranties
THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE."
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE COMPANY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR AVAILABILITY.
THE COMPANY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT:
- THE SERVICE WILL OPERATE WITHOUT INTERRUPTION;
- THE SERVICE WILL BE ERROR-FREE;
- DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED;
- THE SERVICE WILL ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE;
- THE SERVICE WILL MEET THE CUSTOMER'S EXPECTATIONS OR PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS.
15. Limitation of Liability
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, SOLCITY NAV, LLC, ITS OWNERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS, AGENTS, AND AFFILIATES SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF GOODWILL, OR INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE USE OF THE SERVICE.
THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM:
- INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CUSTOMERS;
- UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS;
- THIRD-PARTY ACTIONS;
- INTERNET FAILURES;
- FORCE MAJEURE EVENTS;
- VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL SOFTWARE NOT CAUSED BY THE COMPANY'S GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT.
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY ARISING OUT OF ANY CLAIM RELATING TO THE SERVICE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THE REGISTRATION GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM.
16. Indemnification
The Customer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SolCity Nav, LLC, its owners, directors, officers, employees, contractors, and affiliates from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, expenses, and reasonable attorneys' fees arising out of:
- the Customer's use of the Service;
- Submitted Materials;
- violation of these Terms;
- violation of applicable law;
- infringement of any third-party rights.
17. Suspension and Termination
The Company may suspend, restrict, or terminate any Account or Registration at any time if the Company reasonably believes that:
- these Terms have been violated;
- applicable law has been violated;
- continued use of the Service may expose the Company to legal or financial risk;
- fraudulent or abusive activity has occurred.
Termination of an Account does not affect rights and obligations that accrued prior to termination.
The Company may retain Registration Records where required by law, for dispute resolution, fraud prevention, security, or legitimate business purposes.
18. Governing Law and Jurisdiction
These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, United States, without regard to its conflict of law principles.
Any legal action arising out of or relating to these Terms or the Service shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located in the State of Delaware, and the Customer irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of those courts.
19. Severability
If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
20. Entire Agreement
These Terms, together with the Privacy Policy, Refund Policy, and any other legal policies published by the Company, constitute the entire agreement between the Customer and SolCity Nav, LLC concerning the Service and supersede all prior understandings relating to the same subject matter.
21. Contact Information
SolCity Nav, LLC
651 North Broad Street
Middletown, Delaware 19709
United States
E-mail: scireg@scireg.org
Website: https://scireg.org
